青贮添加剂对芦笋茎叶青贮品质的影响
Alternative TitleEffect of additives on the quality of Asparagus officinalis stem leaf silage
郭海明;  朱雯;  张勇;  黄文明;  焦阳;  叶均安
2018-09-21
Volume25Issue:5Pages:134
Abstract本研究旨在探讨不同添加剂对青贮芦笋茎叶品质的影响。试验在芦笋茎叶鲜样中分别添加乳酸菌、乳酸菌+纤维素酶、乳酸菌+米糠和乳酸菌+纤维素酶+米糠进行青贮调制,乳酸菌、纤维素酶和米糠的添加剂量分别为5×105 cfu/g、0.6 IU/g、30 mg/g,贮存90 d后开包。综合评定芦笋茎叶的青贮质量,测定常规营养成分,浸提液的pH值、氨态氮和有机酸的含量。试验结果表明,与对照组相比,添加乳酸菌提高了乙酸的含量、降低了有氧损失(P<0.05),提高了芦笋青贮料的有氧稳定性;在添加乳酸菌基础上,同时添加米糠和纤维素酶有降低青贮品质的趋势。仅添加乳酸菌即可获得优质芦笋茎叶青贮料。
Other AbstractThe objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different additives on the quality of Asparagus officinalis silage (stem and leaf). Lactobacillus;lactobacillus+cellulose;lactobacillus+rice bran and lactobacillus+cellulose+rice bran were added to silage; the concentration of lactobacillus;cellulose and rice bran were 5×105 cfu/g;0.6 IU/g;30 mg/g of fresh weight respectively. After being ensiled for 90 days;the quality of A. officinalis stem leaf silage was assessed. The chemical composition;pH;NH3-N and organic acid content of fermented juice were analysed. The data showed that;compared with the control group;the addition of lactobacillus increased the acetic acid content;reduced aerobic deterioration (P<0.05) and improved the aerobic stability. Lactobacillus with rice bran and cellulose tended to lower the quality of A. officinalis stem leaf silage. The results demonstrated that high quality A. officinalis stem leaf silage can be obtained with addition of lactobacillus only.
Keyword青贮 芦笋茎叶 乳酸菌 米糠 纤维素酶 silage Asparagus officinalis stem leaf lactobacillus rice bran cellulose
DOI10.11686/cyxb2015380
References[1] Yuan Z;Liu X S. Health function and utilization of Asparagus officinalis . Food Research and Development;2008;28(8): 156-160.
[2] Yu Y F;Luo Y;Deng R G;et al . Analysis of Chinese Asparagus officinalis industry competitiveness. Special Zone Economy;2013;(6): 184-187.
[3] Liu H;Bu D P;Lv Z W;et al . Effects of wilting and additives on fermentation quality of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica;2015;24(5): 126-133.
[4] Guo G;Yuan X;Li L;et al . Effects of fibrolytic enzymes;molasses and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of mixed silage of corn and hulless-barely straw in the Tibetan Plateau. Grassland Science;2014;60(4): 240-246.
[5] Zhu W;Guo H M;Zhang Y;et al . Effects of lactic acid bacteria and wild rice bran supplementation on silage quality of few-flower wild rice ( Zizania latifolia Turcz) leaf sheath. Chinese Journal of Animal Science;2015;51(1): 54-59.
[6] Han G L;Ma Y S;Yang J C;et al . Trial of Asparagus officinalis stem leaf feeding dairy cow and improving milk production. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine;1991;23(1): 28-29.
[7] Zhang L Y. Feed Analysis and Quality Test Technology (Second Edition)[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural University Press;2003.
[8] Van Soest P J;Robertson J B;Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber;neutral detergent fiber;and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science;1991;74: 3583-3597.
[9] Dubois M;Gilles K A;Hamilton J K;et al . Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry;1956;28(3): 350-356.
[10] Playne M J;McDonald P. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture;1966;17(6): 264-268.
[11] Adesogan A T;Krueger N;Salawu M B;et al . The influence of treatment with dual purpose bacterial inoculants or soluble carbohydrates on the fermentation and aerobic stability of bermudagrass. Journal of Dairy Science;2004;87(10): 3407-3416.
[12] Broderick G A;Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science;1980;63(1): 64-75.
[13] Madrid J;Mart&amp;#x000ed;nez-Teruel A;Hern&amp;#x000e1;ndez F;et al . A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric;high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture;1999;79(12): 1722-1726.
[14] Jiang F;Wang J K;Liu J X. Study on simultaneous determination of VFAs and lactic acid by using internal standard method. Chinese Journal of Animal Science;2009;45(21): 73-76.
[15] Liu J X;Yang Z H;Ye J A;et al . Reasonable making and evaluation standard of silage (continued). Feed Industry;1999;20(4): 3-5.
[16] Conaghan P;O&amp;#x02019;Kiely P;O&amp;#x02019;Mara F P. Conservation characteristics of wilted perennial ryegrass silage made using biological or chemical additives. Journal of Dairy Science;2010;93(2): 628-643.
[17] Fu T. The Effects of Microbial Inoculants on the Fermentation Process and Quality of Corn Silage[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;2005: 14.
[18] Xu C C;Yang F Y;Zhang J G;et al . Silage Science and Technology[M]. Beijing: Science Press;2013: 140-141.
[19] Queiroz O C M;Arriola K G;Daniel J L P;et al . Effects of 8 chemical and bacterial additives on the quality of corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science;2013;96(9): 5836-5843.
[20] Xu N X;Ding C L;Gu H R;et al . Effects of adding lactic acid bacteria and rice bran on the fermentation quality of rice straw silage. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences;2010;26(6): 1308-1312.
[21] Hou X J;Shen Y X;Xu N X;et al . Effects of different additives on rice straw silage quality and nutrient component. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences;2011;(6): 356-360.
[22] Ni K;Wang Y;Pang H;et al . Effect of cellulase and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality and chemical composition of wheat straw silage. American Journal of Plant Sciences;2014;5: 1877-1884.
[23] Sun Z H;Liu S M;Tayo G O;et al . Effects of cellulase or lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation and in vitro gas production of several morphological fractions of maize stover. Animal Feed Science and Technology;2009;152(3): 219-231.
[24] Yan H P;Diao Q Y;Zhu N H. Review of enzyme preparation acting as silage additive. Feed China;2005;(22): 20-21.
[25] Mandebvu P;West J W;Froetschel M A;et al . Effect of enzyme or microbial treatment of bermudagrass forages before ensiling on cell wall composition;end products of silage fermentation and in situ digestion kinetics. Animal Feed Science and Technology;1999;77(3): 317-329.
[1] 袁仲;刘新社.芦笋的保健功能与加工技术. 食品研究与开发;2008;28(8): 156-160.
[2] 余艳锋;罗莹;邓仁根;等.中国芦笋产业竞争力分析. 特区经济;2013;(6): 184-187.
[3] 刘辉;卜登攀;吕中旺;等.凋萎和不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 草业学报;2015;24(5): 126-133.
[5] 朱雯;郭海明;张勇;等.添加乳酸菌和米糠对茭白鞘叶青贮品质的影响. 中国畜牧杂志;2015;51(1): 54-59.
[6] 韩光亮;马玉胜;杨继成;等.芦笋茎叶青贮料饲喂奶牛对提高泌乳量的试验. 畜牧与兽医;1991;23(1): 28-29.
[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第2版)[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社;2003.
[14] 姜芳;王佳堃;刘建新.内标法同时测定挥发性脂肪酸和乳酸的方法探究. 中国畜牧杂志;2009;45(21): 73-76.
[15] 刘建新;杨振海;叶均安;等.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准(续). 饲料工业;1999;20(4): 3-5.
[17] 傅彤.微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及其品质的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院;2005: 14.
[18] 徐春城;杨富裕;张建国;等.现代青贮理论与技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社;2013: 140-141.
[20] 许能祥;丁成龙;顾洪如;等.添加乳酸菌和米糠对水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响. 江苏农业学报;2010;26(6): 1308-1312.
[21] 侯晓静;沈益新;许能祥;等.不同添加物对稻草青贮品质及营养组成的影响. 江苏农业科学;2011;(6): 356-360.
[24] 晏和平;刁其玉;朱年华.酶制剂用作青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展. 饲料广角;2005;(22): 20-21.
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://119.78.100.147:8080/handle/2SELTVKS/54907
Collection骨干期刊_草业学报
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安. 青贮添加剂对芦笋茎叶青贮品质的影响[J],2018,25(5):134.
APA 郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安.(2018).青贮添加剂对芦笋茎叶青贮品质的影响.,25(5),134.
MLA 郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安."青贮添加剂对芦笋茎叶青贮品质的影响".25.5(2018):134.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[郭海明;朱雯;张勇;黄文明;焦阳;叶均安]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.